Absalom and Achitophel Homework Help Questions. Discuss Absalom and Achitophel by John Dryden as a plitical Allegory. The definition of allegory has two senses. RPO -- John Dryden: Absalom and Achitophel. John Dryden (1631-1700). Absalom and Achitophel. 1In pious times, ere priest-craft did begin, 2Before polygamy was made a sin; 3When man, on many, multipli'd his kind, 4Ere one to one was cursedly confin'd: 5When Nature prompted, and no Law deni'd.

King David of Israel who is compared to Charles II of England had no legitimate issue from his legally married wife, though he had a number of illegitimate children from his several mistresses. Of these illegitimate issues, Absalom who is compared to the Duke of Monmouth was the bravest, handsomest and most polished of mien and manners. He charmed everybody and won their esteem and regard. He had distinguished himself in a number of battles abroad. He was the favorite child of his father, the King, and popular with the people.


John Dryden (1631-1700)

The Jews (English) were moody and self-willed. They were not satisfied even under the mild and gentle rule of King David. They clamored for greater liberty. They cherished the belief that since they had restored the king to the throne they had also the right to dethrone him. But the sober-minded section of the people was peace-loving. It had not forgotten the horrors that the civil war brought in its train. So, it wanted peace. Further, David ruled so well that even the malcontents among the people could not get a chance to raise the banner of revolt. Only the Devil alone provided them with an excuse to rebel. It was the so-called Popish Plot.

The Jebusites (Catholics) were treated oppressively by the chosen people (Protestants) in a variety of ways. They were deprived of their lands and were made to pay enhanced taxes. They could not be appointed to any high post under the government and were made to suffer many disabilities. They continued to suffer silently, but the situation became highly insufferable for them when their gods and holy relics were burnt. Such a turn in the situation they made a bid to convert the Protestants to their faith. This alarmed the Jewish Rabbles (the clergy) of the Church of England and also inflamed their mind. Hence originated the Popish Plot. This plot was verified with solemn oath by Titus Oates and others and was similarly denied and disowned by the Catholics. It was even alleged that the Jebusites (Catholics) had designed to assassinate the King.

Seperti kita tau bahwa Apliaksi ini Lucky Patcher dapat kita pakai untuk Hack In-App Purchases Game dan Aplikasi Android. Biasanya ketika bermain game kita ingin selalu cepat menerima coin, gold,cash/money atau yang lainya dan itu harus kita beli menggunakan uang sungguhan atau pulsa. Download aplikasi magic blue hack apk Nah untuk kalian yang ingin bermain curang atau nge hack menjadikannya serba unlimited silahkan ikuti tutorial ini.

The plot failed to win its immediate objective, but its repercussions were wide ranging. A number of people who were dissatisfied with the King for this or that reason emerged into activity and set about organizing a revolt against the government. The chief among the disgruntled band was Achitophel (Shaftesbury) who was surprisingly cunning and treacherous. In the matter of principles and morality, he was completely barren and bankrupt. He was perpetually discontented and restless. He made a bold and capable leader in times of danger, but was no good in times of peace. As a judge he was upright and above board, but as a politician he was abominable. He was determined either to rule the state or ruin it. In order to realize his unholy aim, he posed himself as the defender and promoter of the people's cause and a champion of their rights and liberty. He exploited the Popish Plot to inflame the popular mind. He set the rumor on foot that the King himself was a Catholic at heart who had signed a secret treaty with the Catholic France, their enemy. In this way he raised the anger of the heedless Jews.

Achitophel required a person who could act as a leader of the people and yet remain a puppet dancing to the pull of his wire. To him, Absalom appeared to be the most suitable person for his purpose. Achitophel knew that as Absalom was the illegitimate son of the king and had thus no legal title to the throne, he would depend entirely on his support and backing. So he tried to win him to his side by means of a number of cunning and plausible arguments. He began by flattering him and asserting that he was cut out for being a king, and as the people wanted him he must come forward to champion their cause. He tickled his vanity by calling him the savior of the nation and assured him that he was immensely popular. He then pointed to him that there was a current in the affairs of man which, taken on the tide, led on to fortune. Such a golden chance had now come for him and he must hurry to seize it. He must follow the example of his father who returned from exile swiftly at the call of the people and became the king. Again, he should not be afraid of the King because he had forfeited the love and regard of his people and was old, infirm and friendless. He was surrounded by enemies on all sides. If he went in for foreign help, people will detest him all the more. Achitophel further confined to him that by his cunning methods he had turned the people dead against David. People wanted their rights and liberty and they needed a suitable and capable leader to guide them in their movement. And none was as suitable as Absalom because he had royal blood in his veins.

Absalom listened to Achitophel's address attentively and felt flattered. But he hesitated to act upon it at once. In the first flush of thought it appeared to him that the course he was called upon to follow was inappropriate and inadvisable. So he replied to Achitophel thus -

'There is no excuse for me to rebel against my father whose rule is kind, gentle and benevolent. He is so merciful that he pardons even his enemies, and is ever eager to do good to his people. Even if he were a callous and cruel ruler oppressing his subjects it would not have been possible for me to rebel against him because he is after all my father. My sense of duty would deter me. Besides, he loves me and gives me every-thing except the right to inherit the crown because being his illegitimate issue I am not entitled to it. His brother (James) has every right in law to the throne and he is just, noble and capable. I regret that fate has made me illegitimate. I feel that I am fit for being a king, and the desire to be great troubles my heart.'

The concluding observation of Absalom gave hope to Achitophel. He realized shrewdly that Absalom loved to be great, but was hesitant. So he decided to make him firm in his resolve. With that end in view he began further and spoke to Absalom thus,

'You should not let your extraordinary talents rot in idleness. God has made you to rule and so you must give the people the bliss and blessings of your reign, David is undoubtedly gentle and generous, but manly vein and vigor suits a king better. The people take his gentleness as a sign of weakness and so hate him. And thinking him a weak ruler they are trying to free themselves from his bondage. Sanhedrin (Parliament) kept him poor, and every time he approached it for funds he was obliged by it to give up some of his rights. I myself would continue to embarrass him with new plots of entangle him in the mesh of costly wars. His faithful friends are all suspects and he is hated by the people, for he is a Catholic. Moreover, the kings are the trustees of the people who have every right to withdraw the executive authority which the king holds and weilds as their trustee. The laws of succession are made for the good of the people. As for his love, let him show it in actual practice. If he loves you, why does he not declare you his successor? His brother hates you, and is waiting for a suitable opportunity to annihilate you. You should, therefore, take time by the forelock and strike while the iron is hot. You should rise against your father, but pose and declare to the people that the King's life was in danger and you are only trying to free him from the clutches of his enemies, the Catholics. And who can say that, perhaps, David himselfwants to make you the king but is afraid of his brother and wants to be taken by force.'

The most important among Achitophel's followers was Zimri (Duke of Buckingham). He was an inconstant man of rigidly held extremist views. He squandered away his wealth and was banished from court on account of his own fault and foolishness. He then tried to form parties against the King, but could not become the leader of any one of them. He was inherently wicked, but lacked the means to put his wickedness into practice.

Absalom Achitophel Poet

Next in importance in the group was Shimie (Slingsby Bethel, the Sheriff of London). He was so badly corrupt and debased that he did not shrink from even cursing the King. He was a miser of the worst type, so much so that he gave not a single entertainment during the tenure of his office. He starved his servants, drank no wine and kept no kitchen. He made his pile by cheating others in different ways. During his term as magistrate the wicked had a field day and the enemies of the king received every protection. In short, he was a very mean person.

But the worst of them all was Corah (Titus Oates). He was the son of a weaver, but the fact of his hatching the Popish Plot raised him in the people's esteem. He posed as the protector of society and the King and verified the plot on oath. His sunken eyes and harsh, loud voice was indicative of his ill-temper and proud nature. Whoever expressed doubt about his witness was dubbed a Catholic and implicated in his plot. He brought about the assassination of Agog for his being on friendly terms with Jebusites.

Misled by Achitophel, Absalom left the court. As a preliminary step he undertook a tour of the country with stately pomp and glamour. He spoke to the people with becoming humility and expressed sorrow at their hard lot and at his inability to help them, because he could not rise against his father who was the cause of their misery. He could offer them only his tears, his only weapon. His humbleness, his winning manners and charming looker impressed everybody, and wherever he went he was hailed as the 'savior': This tour was maneuvered by the cunning Achitophel. Its purpose was to form an estimate of people's extent of love and support. He wanted to test the strength of their backing before coming out openly in revolt against the King. So the real purpose of Absalom and Achitophel was cleverly concealed behind a show of love and duty for the King. It was war in the guise of peace.

The mind of the people of Israel (England) was corrupted by means of a number of plausible arguments. They were made to believe that in the final analysis power rests with the people and that they were not bound by the bonds entered into by their ancestors. The kings were their trustees and they held the executive authority in trust for them. They, the kings, are in duty bound to exercise that authority for their good. If that authority is used arbitrarily and wrongly, the people were at liberty to withdraw it. The foolish Israelites were deluded by such reasoning. They did not pause to ponder and realize the fact that sons are certainly bound by the actions of their forefathers, for all mankind has to suffer for the sin of Adam. It followed, therefore, that the contract under which the people transferred power to one individual is as binding on them as on their forbears. The contract is irrevocable. Moreover, who is to examine and decide whether the actions of a king are right or wrong? The crowds are fickle-minded and hotheaded, and hence their thinking and arguing cannot be sound and safe to act upon. No orderly and civilized life would be possible if the right to rebel and dethrone the king is conceded to the people. Even if the king is unjust it is not advisable and desirable to topple an established government, for there may ensue a civil war, then, bringing in its train worse suffering for the people than before. But the misguided Israelites could not think on these lines, thanks to Achitophel and -his cunning.

The revolutionary mania was so widely rampant among the people that many of David's friends deserted his company. Even the few who stood by him even then were regarded as enemies of the people. Among such of his friends, the name of Barzillai (Duke of Ormond) was prominent. He was honorable and advanced in age and had always served his King faithfully. He had also accompanied the King in his exile and shared in his sufferings and sorrows abroad. He was generous of heart and a patron of poets and warriors. He had fathered eight children out of whom six were already dead. The poet is all praise for his eldest son who passed away in the prime of his life.

Contoh soal tes toefl ibt pdf merge Jul 21, 2013  Banks are rushing to merge because consolidations enable them to slash theirs costs. Soal Tes TOEFL dan Pembahasan Jawaban Structure (Model Test 1 by Cliffs). Download Soal Listening TOEFL + Kunci Jawaban PDF + Audio (Longman Post-test) Contoh Soal Listening TOEFL Beserta Audio MP3 Kunci Jawaban (Post-Test Longman) Soal TOEFL. Pada dasarnya, dari keseluruhan soal yang diujikan pada tes TOEFL, bagian TOEFL structure adalah bagian yang paling sulit meskipun jumlah soalnya adalah yang paling sedikit diantara bagian soal listening maupun reading, karena sesi ini dalam TOEFL ITP menguji kemampuan para peserta dalam bidang grammar (tata bahasa) bahasa Inggris (English). Jun 24, 2015  TOEFL TV: The Official TOEFL iBT Channel 702,189 views. Tutorial TOEP PLTI 2015 ver 1.0 - Duration. Cara Menjawab Tes Toefl Soal Tes TOEFL Reading Dengan Cepat dan Benar.

Next among the King's friends was Zadoc [the Archbishop of Canterbury]. He was modest and of retiring disposition. Then there was Sagan of Jerusalem the Bishop of London. He was the scion of a noble family and was endowed with a hospitable nature after him was John Dolben, the dean of Westminster on the list. He was noted for his fiery oratory. Also included in the friend group were some distinguished expounders of the law. Then there was a group of loyal peers of whom the eminent personalities were those of Adriel, Earl of Mulgrave, Jonathan, Marquis of Halifax, and Hushal, Earl of Rochester. The last of all came the name of Ameil Edward Seymour, the speaker of the House of Commons.

These enumerated friends of David remained loyal him to the end. They watched with anguish the mounting ramp of revolution, realized the dangers inherent in the situation and warned the King. They suggested to him that drastic action was called for, as mild measures would only worsen the situation.

At long last David, who had suffered with patience and forbearance till then, addressed the people with divinely animated voice and was listened to in pin-drop silence. He told them that as king, he was also the father of his people. So far he had been kind and indulgent towards them as a father should be, but how he would fulfil his duty as a king. The people had mistakenly taken his mercy as a sign of fear on his part. They wanted law and justice, so he would now give them what they wanted. He had been a patient man, and they should beware of the fury of a patient man when roused. He would give them justice and nothing but justice as they clamor for. He knew his own rights. He knew that people or the Parliament alone could not choose a successor to the throne as his consent was also necessary. He would not part with his friends simply on the clamor of the mob; they must first prove something against him. He would teach his people to obey him. His victory was certain. The zest and zeal of the people is soon exhausted and their energy dissipates in no time. Then they can be easily subdued. He would wait for his opportunity and then strike with overwhelming force, so that they may be easily conquered.

God listened to David's speech and agreed with it. Law and order was once more established in the country and he ruled in peace for years on end.

Cite this Page!

Sharma, K.N. 'Absalom and Achitophel by John Dryden: Detailed Summary.' BachelorandMaster, 11 Nov. 2013, bachelorandmaster.com/britishandamericanpoetry/absalom-and-achitophel.html.

Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
Start by marking “Absalom and Achitophel” as Want to Read:
Rate this book

See a Problem?

We’d love your help. Let us know what’s wrong with this preview of Absalom and Achitophel by John Dryden.
Not the book you’re looking for?

Preview — Absalom and Achitophel by John Dryden

Excerpt from Absalom and Achitophel
Thebes did his green unknowing youth engage, He chooses Athens in his riper age.' But these lines prove nothing, being probably prompted by no other motive than the desire of the moment to please an Oxford audience. A passage in a letter from Dryden to Wilmot Earl of Rochester, written in 1675, in which he sends him copies of a Prologue
..more
Published June 1st 2004 by Kessinger Publishing (first published 1681)
To see what your friends thought of this book,please sign up.
To ask other readers questions aboutAbsalom and Achitophel,please sign up.
Recent Questions
You Can Find My Name In The Old Testament
206 books — 43 voters

More lists with this book..
Rating details

I am nowhere near sufficiently well read in poetry to use the term 'neglected classic' here, but I am surprised at how low Dryden's stock seems to be valued on Goodreads and among critics in general. In fact it seems so out of proportion to the obvious quality of this work that I've come up with a theory here:
When Dryden was writing, poetry seems to have been used in a very different way than it is today, with satire and political commentary and witty epigrams being the emphasis, whereas modern
..more
May 11, 2017Manab rated it really liked it · review of another edition
ডরাইডেন নামের যোগয কবি বটেন, সবীকার করে নিতে হচছে।
তাঁর ছনদজঞান বলেন, আর পরিমিতি-জঞান, মানে সে-যুগে ত আজকের মত বা গত দেড়শো বছরের মতও কবিতা লেখার চল হয় নাই, সুতরাং ছনদের আর পরিমিতিবোধের যুগপৎ জঞানের বাইরে আর কোনো কিছুর কি খুব পরয়োজন পড়তো? এগুলোও ত খুবপরি শসতা নয়, চরচচার বযাপার আছে, মোকশো করবার বযাপার আছে। তাছাড়া, এই বইটা পড়বার একটা মজা হচছে, এইখানে কবিতার পেছনে পেছনে কবি বলতেছেন ঐ জেমসের নাতি দবিতীয় চারলস করমওয়েল মরলে পরে যখন মসনদে ফিরে আসে, তখন কীভাবে তার পুতর মনমাউথ তার বিরুদধে হুদা-ই বিদরোহ কর
..more
Let's give credit where credit is due on this one - sure it is a political allegory that suits Restoration 'popish plots' and exclusion claims on the succession of the Royal Monarchy, but it's still pretty intriguing. Just using the word popish..i know sounds awful. Yet ask yourself this, would you be interested in an intriguing expose of Tony Blair trying to convince Kate Middleton, newly converted to Scientology, that she should usurp the throne and become the next queen if you saw it in Hell..more
Aug 19, 2015Nidhi Mahajan rated it liked it
Definitely enjoyed it much more than I thought I would. The poem explores Restoration politics through Biblical allusions (knowledge of both is a precursor to put the poem in context). If you're planning to study Dryden (out of interest or for class), I recommend that you read Mac Flecknoe first. I found Mac Fleknoe to be more accessible than Absalom and Achitophel, though the latter seems to be more representative of Dryden as a poet and satirist.
Aug 15, 2014Prerna Vijayeni rated it liked it · review of another edition
Brilliant political allegory, witty satire laced with biblical imagery, some manipulated some authentic, but one surely has to read it twice to fully get it. Political upheaval of the time gave Dryden a chance to display his literary talent. After this stoke of genius nobody remembers him as a dramatist, but only as a man of verses!
Nov 18, 2013Charles rated it really liked it
Admittedly. this is a hard read, and by hard I do mean somewhat tedious and confusing for the modern reader, especially without the necessary notes or historical background.
However, I was shocked by all these predominantly negative reviews. This is a classic for crying out loud, one of Dryden's masterpieces and one of the most relevant and controversial works of the poetry of eighteenth century poetry in England. The historical implications are astronomical, its biblical allusions merely a disgu
..more
Feb 13, 2013Emily rated it did not like it
Restoration politics retold through biblical allusions are not my thing in this life. Maybe next round.
Surprisingly, quite a simple read for England's poet laureate.
This text is a superb example of antiquated writing, marred as it is by obscure references to people and places, stand-ins for contemporaries of his time whom have little or no meaning to the modern reader. Moreover, it's mired in flagrantly antisemitic/monotheistic rhetoric which makes it appear more like a diatribe; deliberately antagonistic and intolerant.
Moreover, the narrative of the poem is overwhelmed with character portraiture. More than half of the poem consists of descriptions of a pe
..more
May 14, 2017Hadeer Salem rated it liked it
The poem is political . it is a symbolic poem , a bibical allegory have a hidden meaning in addition to its surface meaning . it is about two events ; one is historical and the other is factual . Dryden use the historical one to refere the factual one . he use the bibical story of the revolt of 'Absalom' against his father 'king David' as a parallel to the revolt of 'Duke of monmouth' against his father 'king charles' .
I read this to study for the English GRE. I think it's the first Dryden I've ever read, and I'm still not a fan of Restoration literature. Oops.
Sep 30, 2017Ipshita Peters rated it it was ok · review of another edition
John DRYden indeed, this is the most unexciting poem I've ever read.
Heavily footnoted and analogous, but expertly crafted.
Jan 01, 2014Andrea Hickman Walker rated it liked it
I found this rather hard to follow. I think it would have been a bit easier if I'd read it (as opposed to listened to it). I think part of the problem was my not knowing that period of history very well - both the time of David and the time of Charles I. But a biography of the latter is waiting for me, so perhaps that will illumine this.
An interested commentary on the monarchy of the time, seen through Biblical context. Not quite as entertaining as MacFlecknoe, but not as subjective, or satirical either.
Mar 10, 2014Chris Schaben rated it did not like it
Very, very dull poem. There's a reason his last name is Dry-den.
May 05, 2016Noah rated it did not like it

Dryden Absalom Achitophel Pdf Download

Sometimes satirical, sometimes demeaning; altogether an example of horrid pacing and incomplete thought.
Ugh. What?
Jul 28, 2016Tasha added it
January 2012
I read it but still NOT sure what happened ! So there was a plot blah blah blah but NOTHING really happen . Did someone die ? Have I missed something ?
Lisa Christian rated it it was amazing
Feb 12, 2017
There are no discussion topics on this book yet.Be the first to start one »
Absalom
Recommend ItStatsRecent Status Updates
See similar books…
See top shelves…
75followers

Dryden Absalom Achitophel Pdf Online

Librarian Note: There is more than one author in the GoodReads database with this name. See this thread for more information.
John Dryden (19 August [O.S. 9 August] 1631 – 12 May [O.S. 1 May] 1700) was an English poet, literary critic, translator, and playwright who was made Poet Laureate in 1668. He is seen as dominating the literary life of Restoration England to such a point that the period came
..more

Absalom Achitophel

More quizzes & trivia..

Dryden Absalom And Achitophel Pdf

“Great wits are to madness near allied
And thin partitions do their bounds divide.”
— 51 likes

Absalom Achitophel As Augustan Poem

“But far more numerous was the herd of such,
Who think too little, and who talk too much.”
— 24 likes

Dryden Absalom Achitophel Pdf Pdf

More quotes…
d3nho.netlify.com – 2018